Chaos. A gaping pit waiting to swallow us all. Or so it appears. The US and Israel are at war with Iran. Iran is striking back across the region. The global economy trembles on the edge. Everywhere you look, it feels like the board has been overturned, pieces scattered, rules abandoned.
But for those playing the game, it's not chaos at all. It's an opportunity to remake the Middle East.
"Geopolitics only makes sense if you assume everyone's playing the same game. They're not." The US, Israel, Iran, the Arabs, and China are all playing different games. Five games, five strategies, one region. And if you don't understand the games that are played, nothing in the Middle East right now will make any sense at all.
This is the premise: what looks like a single chaotic conflict is actually five separate games being played simultaneously on the same board. Each player thinks they're playing a different game. Each game has different rules, different win conditions, different definitions of victory. The pieces overlap. The territories are shared. But the logic driving each player is entirely its own.
Donald Trump declares the golden age of Israel and the Middle East. Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of Israel as a superpower "more than ever." Lindsey Graham grins on camera: "When this regime goes down, we're going to have a new Mid-East. We're going to make a ton of money." And somewhere in Tehran, a foreign minister calmly explains they are not asking for a ceasefire.
Before we can talk about the New Middle East, we need to understand the game that dominated the old one.
Risk is a game about controlling the board and removing pieces before the map turns against you. Power doesn't come from holding every square. It comes from holding territories that control movement and resources. That's the logic of empire. And the most important rule of Risk: prevent consolidation before a rival becomes unstoppable.
This was the game that dominated the old Middle East, and it crystallized after the Iranian Revolution of 1979, when the US-backed Shah was swept from power and America lost its most dependable regional proxy overnight. The response was immediate and absolute.
"An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America. And such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force."
— Jimmy Carter · The Carter Doctrine
That is why Iraq was destroyed. That is why Syria was weakened. That is why Iran was isolated. And now Iran faces the onslaught of war. Because that's how empire manages the board. George W. Bush called them "an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world." The language was moral. The logic was spatial. You don't allow a rival to consolidate territory. You break them before they can.
US military protection anchored the Gulf states — that's why you see so many bases there. Scattered across the region like blue army pieces on a Risk board: naval stations, air bases, joint operations centers. But that protection came with a bargain. Gulf security in exchange for American access to oil and the trade routes that move it across the world. The Carter Doctrine realized.
But now, something fundamental shifts. The US and Israel have launched a war against Iran, despite warnings from Arab states not to. The Gulf states are bearing the brunt of Iran's retaliation — the missiles, the instability, the economic shocks. They didn't start this war. They didn't want this war. And now they're in the middle of it.
"GCC countries have been saying for the past two weeks that they want de-escalation, they want dialogue. They've been at pains to stress that this is not their war to fight and that their posture is very much one of defense, not offense."
American defense, analysts note, is focused on Israel — without the Gulf states that host many of the military bases. A kind of resentment is building. The ally — or the partner, "if we describe it accurately" — the American partner, is revealing where its priorities truly lie.
This war is revealing the limits of the system. The old Middle East is no longer tenable because when the security guarantor becomes the source of instability, the whole system begins to fracture.
At some point, the United States will pick up and go home. And the Gulf states will be left holding the mess. The Risk board was always built on a bargain. And the bargain is breaking.
The Arab world is like a Jenga tower. Jenga is a game about pulling blocks out of a tower without causing it to collapse, even as you build it higher. But every block you remove makes the structure more fragile. And this has been the story of the Arab states.
They were built on borders drawn by colonial powers — the Sykes-Picot lines carving the map into administrative units that bore no relationship to the people living inside them. The tower looked solid, but the base was never strong.
Then came the creation of Israel in 1948, which reshaped the entire region. It triggered wars, ethnically cleansed populations, and fractured the Arab political system from the very beginning. Another block pulled. During the Cold War, the region became a battleground for outside powers. Arab states weren't shaping the board — they were pieces on it. Another block.
Over time, the system weakened further and further. Civil war shattered Lebanon. The US invasion collapsed Iraq. War tore Syria apart. And genocide consumed Palestine and Sudan. Every crisis pulled another block out of the tower.
Across this fragile board, the US played its game of Risk. Military protection anchored the Gulf states, but that protection came at a price — Gulf security in exchange for American access to oil and the trade routes that move it across the world.
Now something fundamentally shifts. The US and Israel have launched a war against Iran, despite warnings from Arab states not to. The Gulf states are bearing the brunt of Iran's retaliation.
One analyst puts it plainly: "They didn't start this war, they didn't want this war, and now they're in the middle of it. At some point in time, the United States, when the war is over and they pick up and they go home, and they're left kind of holding the mess."
Washington's priorities are becoming nakedly clear. American defense is focused on Israel, while the Gulf states that host the military bases absorb the blows. The resentment builds. The partner reveals what the alliance always was.
When the security guarantor becomes the source of instability, the whole system begins to fracture. The old Middle East is no longer tenable. The Jenga tower trembles — and the hand pulling the blocks belongs to the one who was supposed to be holding it steady.
Joe Biden said it plainly: "Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region." Israel must be understood as an extension of US empire, an integral part of its Risk board. But at the same time, Israel is playing its own game.
Settlers of Catan is about expanding across the board, building settlements, and controlling resources. In other words, the Zionist pursuit of Greater Israel.
"Now, this is the promise of God to the patriarchs of the Jewish nation. I think it's Iraq. And Syria. And part of Saudi Arabia. This is a holy place."
— Israeli settlers interviewed on camera
"One day, it's all going to be ours, and the Arabs know that. They also have the Bible."
When Tucker Carlson asks "Does Israel have the right to that land? Because you're appealing to Genesis. You're saying that's the original deed" — the answer comes without hesitation: "It would be fine if they took it all." A vision of Greater Israel stretching from the Euphrates to the Nile. Guided by biblical claims of what the land of Israel should be, and since its inception, Israel has worked to make this vision a reality.
Like Catan, Israel's game is played slowly. Turn by turn. Settlement by settlement. Irreversible facts on the ground. From the occupation across all of Palestine to the expansion into Lebanon and Syria, the logic is simple: expand the network of control. Because in Settlers of Catan, the player who builds the strongest settlement system eventually dominates the land.
Netanyahu makes the goal explicit: "increasing the status of Israel as a superpower more than ever." The ambition is not security. It is transformation — of Israel into the king of the New Middle East.
But for that, expansion alone is not enough. Strong Arab states and Arab unity have always been the biggest obstacle to the vision of Greater Israel. When surrounding countries are divided, the tower around Israel becomes weaker. So for decades, Israel has focused on removing blocks to fragment the region. It did it in Lebanon during the civil war, and it is now doing it in Syria.
But there's one country that has stood in the way. Iran is the largest regional power outside US influence that is capable of challenging Israeli dominance. Which is why Israel does not seek a stable Iran — it seeks a weakened one. The goal is the same strategy used elsewhere in the region: weaken the tower.
And as the war unfolds, Israel sees an opportunity to weaken the Gulf states too. A weakened region means fewer players capable of challenging Israel's rise. The Catan board expands. The settlements multiply. The game is patient, and it is winning.
When asked if Iran could attack the American homeland, the Foreign Minister answers calmly: "No, they have enough bases around us. Why we should go further than that?"
Yes — those military bases on the US Risk board. Since the revolution in 1979, Iran has been confronted with the reality of American dominance and encirclement in the Middle East. A system that sees Iran itself as a threat. So Iran turned to a strategy best explained by Nard — one of the oldest games in the world, invented in ancient Persia, the precursor to backgammon.
In Nard, you don't need to dominate the board to win. You just need to survive long enough for your opponent to make a mistake. The game is built around four principles.
In Nard, players build walls of pieces that stop their opponent from moving forward, forcing them to slow down or take another path. Iran plays the same way, building deterrence networks across the region: Hezbollah in Lebanon, militias in Iraq, Houthis in Yemen. Turning encirclement into a tool of deterrence. You surround me? I make your surroundings hostile.
Even when pieces are knocked off the board, they can return and rebuild their position. For decades, Iran has absorbed pressure — sanctions, isolation, and now all-out war. It was forced to become more self-reliant, building its own weapons industry, missile programs, and domestic manufacturing base. The pieces come back. They always come back.
The best Nard players know when to advance, when to defend, and when to slow the game down entirely. Sometimes, the smartest move is patience.
"I don't see any room for diplomacy anymore."
— Kamal Kharrazi
"So your side is ready for a long war if the United States and Israel choose that?"
"It is an existential threat to the Islamic Republic, and therefore we have to stay with full might, as we are doing now."
— Kamal Kharrazi
Tehran is not looking for a quick ceasefire. It is preparing for a long war of attrition, where time itself becomes an essential part of the strategy. When asked directly — "Right now you're saying Iran does not want a ceasefire?" — the Foreign Minister is unequivocal: "We are not asking for a ceasefire."
In Nard, if an opponent leaves a piece exposed, you strike — sending it back to the beginning of the board. Iran applies the same logic in war. It doesn't try to match the US and Israel missile for missile or jet for jet. Instead, it targets the vulnerable points of the system: American bases across the region, oil infrastructure in the Gulf, and the global choke points that power the world economy.
Because the Middle East is not just a battlefield — it is the crossroads of the global energy system. Iran is determined. There's no going back to the old Middle East where the US and Israel can attack whenever they want. To them, a new Middle East must be built.
And in that project, they have a partner.
China. China. China. China. China. China. China. China. China. China. China. China. China.
While the US is playing Risk across the world to dominate and control the board, China is challenging the US empire by playing Go to build a multipolar world. Go is an ancient game that avoids direct confrontation, decisive battles, or conquest. It builds positions through connections.
That's how China approaches the Middle East. Not through military bases, but through trade, infrastructure, diplomacy, and energy partnerships. The strategy is called the Belt and Road Initiative. Red lines on a map stretching from Beijing to every port, every pipeline, every intersection that matters.
Iran sits on one of the most important intersections of that board. It's a connector that allows China to look westward as the United States tries to contain it in the east through the first island chain.
China sees Iran as a critical partner in weakening US dominance in the Middle East — a power structure built around Risk and Settlers of Catan. Iran also provides China with something rare: a major energy supplier outside US control. Even as sanctions crushed Iran's total crude exports, China's crude imports from Iran remained significant — a lifeline that kept both games in play.
And together, they are building something even more threatening to Washington: a sanctions-resistant system for trade, energy, and finance that bypasses the US dollar entirely. Not a military alliance. Not a treaty bloc. Something more subtle — a Go position, where stones placed patiently in corners and along edges suddenly reveal that the center has been surrounded.
That is the real reason why the US is launching a war against Iran. For the US, it's not just about regional dominance — it's about global supremacy. And China is the real threat. Because for Beijing, a new Middle East might mean something bigger: a new world order, no longer built on American hegemony, but built on a multipolar world.
The Go board is patient. It does not announce itself. The stones are quiet. The encirclement is complete before anyone realizes it has begun.
Five games, five strategies, one region. And there are three possible scenarios for what comes next.
The old Middle East hardens. US dominance resumes. Israel rises as the region's uncontested power. The Risk board is restored — the same player, the same rules, the same bases, the same bargains. The Catan settlements become permanent. The tower stays broken, and the pieces are too scattered to rebuild.
Trump and Netanyahu sign documents in the Oval Office. The golden age arrives — for some.
Iran's strategy of resilience and deterrence pays off. US pressure weakens. Israel faces stronger resistance. Iran emerges as a central power challenging the old order. The Jenga tower is rebuilt — not by the colonial powers this time, but by the people who live inside it.
Patience wins. The opponent made a mistake. The Nard player collects.
Gulf powers hedge between Washington and Beijing. China expands its economic influence. The region evolves into a multipolar Middle East — no single hegemon, no single game. The Go stones surround the Risk board. The tower stands on new foundations.
The board is remade. Everyone plays a new game.
"The Middle East will not be going back to the old board."
Five players sit at the same table. Each thinks they're playing a different game. The American rolls dice and moves armies across continents. The Israeli places settlements one hex at a time. The Arab states watch their tower tremble. The Iranian counts moves and waits. The Chinese places a stone in silence and the board changes shape.
The pieces are scattered. The rules are contested. The board is shared. And the game — all five of them — continues.
🎲 🎲 🎲 🎲 🎲